22.2.26

BREAKING: Jailed Without Justice—154 Days of Heartbreak: Urging President Lee to Free Dr. Hak Ja Han: A Nation's Remorse and Urgent Plea for the Release of Korea's Beacon of Global Peace

 February 23, 2026 | Seoul, Republic of Korea

An Open Letter of Deep Regret and Imperative Demand for Rectification: Liberating the Mother of Peace to Purify the Planet and Terminate All Conflicts

To Her Holiness Dr. Hak Ja Han, Esteemed as the Mother of Peace and Holy Mother Han; His Excellency President Lee Jae-myung; Respected Members of the National Assembly of the Republic of Korea; Valued Citizens of the Republic of Korea; and the 8 Billion Global Citizens Dedicated to Empathy, Solidarity, and Enduring Tranquility:

Lee Jae-myung, the esteemed citizens of the Republic of Korea, and fellow global citizens, we extend our most profound and heartfelt apologies for the egregious wrong committed against Dr. Hak Ja Han—an 83-year-old symbol of harmony and compassionate leadership. This open letter, prepared as an in-depth journalistic probe by the committed journalists at Happy TV News, in collaboration with the Global Peace Building Network (GPBNet) and advocates of the True Love Revolution, incorporates the most recent updates from South Korea and worldwide as of February 22, 2026. Drawing from reliable sources such as Yonhap News Agency, The Korea Times, Anadolu Agency, Korea JoongAng Daily, Chosun Ilbo, The Washington Post, and global human rights assessments, this report exposes a severe breach of human rights directed at a dedicated promoter of cohesion. It interlaces her motivational personal journey of resilient compassion and upliftment, while detailing concrete, feasible measures for people everywhere to defend spiritual liberties, bridge divides, and advance a universal campaign toward the eradication of all hostilities.

Dr. Hak Ja Han, co-founder of the Family Federation for World Peace and Unification (FFWPU) and globally recognized as the Mother of Peace, persists in facing unwarranted pretrial incarceration in South Korea over contested accusations of political corruption and monetary misconduct—claims staunchly refuted by her supporters and defense as contrived and driven by political motives. Detained on September 22, 2025, without a guilty verdict or full judicial process, she has endured 154 days in confinement as of February 22, 2026, with only intermittent health-related pauses. This week's developments in South Korea have heightened focus on spiritual liberties, protections for aging detainees, and excessive prosecutorial actions, bolstered by echoes from the International Religious Freedom (IRF) Summit 2026 in Washington, D.C., earlier this month. Key progress includes the Seoul Central District Court's ruling on February 11, 2026, to briefly halt her detention from 10:00 a.m. on February 12 to 2:00 p.m. on February 21 for critical medical attention, after a February 4 appeal from her legal representatives highlighting her advanced age and declining condition—mirroring a fleeting November 2025 discharge for glaucoma procedure that was not sustained.

These events mirror wider journalistic patterns this week: growing conversations on encroachments against belief groups, defenses for at-risk prisoners, and worldwide criticisms, especially from the IRF Summit. For example, a February 21 report in Chosun Ilbo noted the court's rejection of her extension request, leading to her return to detention despite health assertions of falls and frailty. A February 22 article in Anadolu Agency confirmed the Seoul Central District Court's denial of the health-based extension, underscoring dangers of cardiogenic shock and recent tumbles that sparked communal debates on humane imprisonment. Internationally, February 2026 reporting from Reuters and The Washington Post connected her predicament to cross-border spiritual frictions, with mounting pleas for her liberation resonating in the U.S., Europe, Asia, and further afield. On X, traction surged under #ReleaseTheMotherOfPeace, with entries like one from @DemianDunkley on February 20 questioning the rationale for returning her to a "cement cell" given detention's harm to her health, and @monarchreport25 on February 21 detailing her scheduled return amid persistent health fears, garnering thousands of interactions and energizing the initiative.

This travesty outright contravenes South Korea's Constitution: Article 20 protects spiritual freedom from governmental intrusion; Article 12 requires fair procedure and bans capricious arrests; Article 11 guarantees legal equality; and Article 21 safeguards speech and gathering—all flagrantly ignored. Her formidable 14-member defense squad, including ex-prosecutors and jurists, contends that authorities depend on dubious statements while rejecting health petitions, paralleling discrepancies in inquiries involving former First Lady Kim Keon-hee and revealing ingrained prejudices.

At 83, Dr. Han's fragile well-being amplifies the emergency: advancing macular degeneration approaching sightlessness, severe glaucoma, diabetes, atrial fibrillation risking heart failure, notable weight reduction, and crippling knee ailments forcing her to crawl for necessities. In January 2026, she suffered three recorded falls (January 5, 15, and 23) causing hip and pelvic injuries, plus a January 27 courtroom collapse that paused sessions. A February 9 court-mandated review stemmed from postponed hearings, with allies emphasizing inadequate pain management and the need for continuous expert care. These scenarios infringe the United Nations' Nelson Mandela Rules, which dictate confinement as a final option for seniors or the unwell, emphasizing respect and alternatives to custody—principles South Korea, as a model democracy, should maintain but has lamentably forsaken.

Dr. Hak Ja Han returned to the Seoul Detention Center on February 21, 2026, at 2 p.m. KST, after the court's refusal to prolong her medical suspension. This interim halt, approved on February 11 and active from February 12, was not a release on bail but a confined respite limited to hospital grounds, permitting interaction solely with healthcare providers and attorneys. Currently, her advocates await a verdict on further extension, amid escalating alarms over her worsening state. Since her apprehension on September 22, 2025, on denied bribery allegations, Dr. Han has faced at least three in-custody falls at the Seoul Detention Center: January 5, 15, and 23, 2026. Per CDC statistics, falls rank as the primary source of harm (fatal and non-fatal) for those 65 and older. The South Korean Constitution (Article 10) assures human worth and the pursuit of joy, interpreted by tribunals to encompass health rights and compassionate handling. Willfully disregarding medical proof (e.g., fall records and ailments) in mandating detention, resulting in harm or fatality, might constitute severe negligence under the Judges Act (Article 45) or Criminal Code (Article 122, misuse of authority).

What path will South Korea choose as the international community urges President Lee to free the blameless Mother of Peace?

A former political detainee likens his ordeal under communist Czechoslovakia to Dr. Hak Ja Han's present confinement in South Korea. Peter Zoehrer, February 21, 2026. A poignant image of Dr. Hak Ja Han (83) in a wheelchair, head lowered, escorted by an assistant through a thronged space (September 2025 court outing). It conveys the profound emotional and bodily toll. (Source: The New York Times). Insights from PhDr. Juraj Lajda (Ph.D.), educator and editor, ex-political captive under Czechoslovakia's communist rule. A Devastating Reentry to Confinement. Prague, February 21, 2026 – Mere hours past, the update arrived: Dr. Hak Ja Han, the 83-year-old head of the Family Federation for World Peace and Unification, has reentered her holding cell at the Seoul Detention Center. Following a scant ten-day interim halt in detention for vital medical care in a clinic, the Seoul Central District Court dismissed her team's plea for prolongation. She resumes imprisonment despite verified grave health issues – diminishing vision worsened by glaucoma, major mobility constraints post-knee operation, and critical cardiac ailment (arrhythmia) necessitating surgery just five months prior. Accounts reveal recent custodial falls have aggravated her vulnerable state. I am deeply stunned and distressed by the handling this senior spiritual figure faces from South Korea's regime. To me—and I trust to many of ethical mind—it is evidently clear that her condition could not have miraculously steadied in such brief span that her existence is no longer perilously threatened. The short respite, from February 12 to 21, was a benevolent act recognizing pressing health demands, yet its sudden termination poses alarming queries about emphases in a purportedly democratic legal framework. Resonances of My Imprisonment. As one who endured extended detention under a communist system in Eastern Europe, I can attest from firsthand knowledge that even in those tyrannical eras, captives—including political ones—garnered more empathetic regard for severe health matters than Dr. Han encounters today in a country deemed fully democratic since 1987. “Even under communism, I garnered more humane medical regard than Dr. Han does now in democratic South Korea.” Her trial vividly revives my own torment as a political detainee in Czechoslovakia in the early 1970s. By remarkable chance—for adhering to South Korean Rev. Sun Myung Moon's doctrines—I was condemned, with 17 other youths (largely college students), to three years and two months for supposed republic subversion. Officials exposed us to almost ten months of rigorous pretrial scrutiny before proceedings began. Formal prison intake photo of Dr. Juraj Lajda, captured in Bratislava in 1973 post-arrest under communist governance. During that time, I was held in a Bratislava remand facility. Daily questionings persisted unyieldingly until dossiers sealed and the accuser drafted charges. My chamber spanned a mere 2x3 meters, frequently jammed with two or three co-detainees, fostering perpetual mental and physical stress. About six months in, my chronic atopic eczema flared with unmatched intensity. Prison settings—subpar cleanliness, tension, poor diet—sparked a sharp decline: my hands fully enveloped in swollen, oozing eczema, gravely impairing my general wellness and inflicting immense agony. The Physician Who Prioritized Humanity Over Doctrine. I swiftly notified the facility doctor of my worsening plight. Constrained by basic medical resources in detention, he acknowledged the criticality and orchestrated my relocation to a specialized Brno prison unit for adequate therapy. I stayed under guard there for 40 days, till the ailment balanced and was effectively remedied. Even in Brno, I remained a captive: my liberty, mobility, and external contacts stayed tightly curtailed. Yet the quarters were markedly more humane—spacious, with a suitable bed—and the routine adjusted to aid recovery. Daily, I was guided to the clinic for focused treatment. The medics there genuinely strove to mend my health, viewing me not as a ideological foe but a needy patient. The pivotal choice—to admit me and set the length—lay with the treating doctor. He couldn't predict recovery duration; his only focus was effective cure. Committed to the Hippocratic Oath from medical graduation, he swore to safeguard human life above all. Politically impartial, he maintained a core human tenet: even a charged person is foremost a being meriting care. This persisted even in a communist jail. Stemming from a medical lineage—my father a renowned surgeon—I long grasped doctors' deep moral duties. In my instance, requisite endorsements from judges or probers were granted as the health necessity was unmistakable. A Jarring Inversion: Communist Compassion vs. “Democratic” Severity. Circling back: this all transpired in communist Czechoslovakia in 1974. Even under that suppressive order, political captives like me enjoyed a more merciful stance on grave illness than exists for Dr. Hak Ja Han under President Lee's South Korean leadership. I am shocked and horrified by this stark disparity. Who Commands a Human Life? Who presently wields supreme control over Dr. Han’s wellness—the prosecutor, judge, investigator, or the treating physician most versed in her state? “Prosecutors and judges lack medical training. They cannot supersede life-preserving health verdicts.” If health experts advise prolonged hospital attention and court approval is needed, what viable rationale for refusal? Prosecutors and judges aren't qualified doctors able to override specialist evaluations on treatment span. Is strict legal compliance truly holier than life conservation? What sort of justice permits such rulings? Do these functionaries truly fit roles of justice dispensation? “Ten days of leniency cannot obliterate five months of decline.” Why haven't South Korean physicians voiced dissent? They, above others, grasp her critical gravity—cardiac threats, fresh falls, ongoing decay in custody. Is the Hippocratic Oath, with its eternal mandate to “inflict no harm” and favor life, no longer obligatory in South Korea? The Intolerable Reality: Gradual Demise Masked as Equity. Absent true health precedence, this extended detention—now exceeding five months, with mere brief, conditional breaks—equates to naught but the deliberate erosion of an aged individual, or bluntly, a mode of gradual homicide. “I inquire as one who endured communism: what trajectory is South Korea pursuing?” My firm deduction, rooted in harsh personal ordeal, is that even under the communist order I withstood, political detainees received superior handling in health and humanity matters than in contemporary South Korea. This fact compels a troubling inquiry: is South Korea, once Asia's democratic light, now veering dangerously toward authoritarianism evocative of the communist frameworks it once resisted?

For over 65 years, since jointly establishing the movement in the 1950s with her late spouse, Rev. Sun Myung Moon, Dr. Han has tirelessly committed to Korea and the globe. Born amid North Korea's war chaos, she led postwar rebuilding through anti-communist efforts, like the 1975 gatherings that mobilized 1.2 million Koreans during Cold War threats. Her initiatives supported industrial titans such as Samsung and Hyundai, fueling Korea's "Miracle on the Han River" from a 1960 GDP of $1.5 billion to its current economic dominance. In foreign affairs, she facilitated the 1991 meeting with Kim Il Sung for unification and the 1990 exchange with Mikhail Gorbachev to ease global strains. She launched the Women's Federation for World Peace in 1992 (now in 157 nations) and the Universal Peace Federation in 2005 (operating in over 200 countries), promoting interreligious accord, family morals, and dispute resolution. Her principles of equity and unity have aided leaders across Korean administrations, including tacit backing for President Lee Jae-myung's goals of fairness and inter-Korean accord—yet, ironically, under his tenure, she was detained without a court ruling and remains held, a stark inconsistency demanding correction. 2026 accounts from The Washington Post (February 3) and familyfedihq.org revisit these achievements, emphasizing her anti-communism and peace promotion amid ongoing Korean probes.

A compelling authentic personal account illustrates her core of upliftment and mercy: Despite Rev. Moon's near-lethal captivity in North Korea during the Korean War and her family's faith-driven harassment, they returned in 1991 with welcoming spirits. As Dr. Han expressed, "Seeing others purely as foes hinders mercy. Only a parental essence, a mother's infinite affection, allows it. I sought not retribution, but unity." This motherly insight birthed the Joint Declaration on the Denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula, showing that tranquility stems from courageous reconciliation, not retaliation—a teaching for our fractured world today.

In 2026, more than 130 active armed clashes devastate over 100 nations—from Ukraine and Gaza to Sudan, Myanmar, and Nigeria—uprooting millions and propelling humankind toward disaster. Over 20 conflicts have endured for more than two decades, leaving generations knowing only war. Half the planet—100 countries—contends with warfare at this moment. What are you delaying for? If this reality strikes true, what will you undertake each day? Dr. Han's "One Family Under God" ethos and True Love tenets provide an ethical structure to turn rivals into relatives. Logically and pragmatically, her prompt and absolute liberation is vital: As a prophetic spiritual mentor, she can steer the 2026 Global Ceasefire Initiative, consecrating the Earth to eliminate brutality. Without her direction, strife endures; with her emancipation, grassroots, love-centered efforts can wipe out discord. Solely by freeing Her Holiness Holy Mother Han to sanctify all Earth can ALL WARS CEASE in 2026. #ReleaseTheMotherOfPeace. Every person on Earth must rise today and engage: Demonstrate at once, circulate appeals for her freedom, propagate her peace inheritance via outlets, contact officials through e-government, and embrace daily peace practices via GPBNet's True Love Revolution—such as mercy reflections, family fortification, and interbelief dialogues—for relentless worldwide sway on social platforms.

This week's IRF Summit amplified global awareness, with key voices condemning repressions in South Korea and Japan as attacks on faith rights, cautioning against planetary backslide. Newt Gingrich labeled Dr. Han's management a "savage misuse of authority," beseeching liberty for this senior peace champion. Katrina Lantos Swett called it a "broad infringement" fueled by misinformation, bemoaning the "astonishing" apathy. Paula White praised U.S. interventions, like Vice President J.D. Vance's role in Pastor Son Hyun-bo's February 3 liberation after 143 days, demonstrating moral alliances overcome barriers. Former U.S. Congressman Dan Burton, at the IRF Summit, issued a fervent mandate for Dr. Hak Ja Han's rapid liberation, portraying her detention as a grave violation of spiritual freedom—a bedrock of the U.S. Constitution's First Amendment and essential to democratic partnerships. He voiced dismay that South Korea, a U.S. collaborator, persists in holding Dr. Han despite universal outcry, advising that inaction might trigger alliance reassessment. This aligns with thorough examination of South Korea's spiritual freedom hurdles, notably pursuits of conservative Christian leaders for political views. Dr. Han's case symbolizes wider curbs on expression under the current administration. Burton's viewpoint, from a seasoned legislator knowledgeable in faith liberty, strengthens urgent calls for swift Seoul resolution. Demian Dunkley, president of the Family Federation for World Peace and Unification USA, spoke at the IRF Summit 2026 in Washington, DC. He drew parallels between Cambodia's Khmer Rouge genocide—which he visited at Hak Ja Han’s urging—and her current detention in South Korea. He depicted Dr. Hak Ja Han, the 83-year-old co-founder honored as the Mother of Peace, as enduring harsh circumstances including isolation, movement barriers, and inadequate medical aid post her September 2025 arrest on bribery claims, a July 2025 raid involving thousands of officers on her residence, and subsequent charge. The address highlighted ongoing anxieties about spiritual freedom in South Korea, where the Family Federation faces review amid larger political and legal pressures, including dissolution demands similar to Japan's. Dunkley emphasized Han’s international peace pursuits—praying at historic atrocity sites in Africa, Europe, and Asia—and framed her treatment as stifling an “inconvenient belief.” He alerted that state excess on spiritual conscience jeopardizes democratic foundations and human rights. This presentation at the IRF Summit, a central venue for worldwide spiritual liberty advancement, illuminates how legal actions against faith heads can interlink with geopolitical and domestic tensions. It stresses the need for balanced responsibility that honors age, health, and fundamental freedoms. When charges target senior spiritual icons, does the pursuit of equity risk undermining the rights it claims to protect? The occasion was tempered by ongoing worry. White expressed deep concern for Dr. Hak Ja Han, the 83-year-old faith leader who remains confined, pushing emphasis on her wellness, respect, and entitlements. Her guidance to Japan, Korea, and all states was direct: spiritual freedom must be upheld completely, fairly, and consistently. She asserted that unfairness must never become discriminatory, due process must never become an instrument, and belief must never turn into a stigma. The White House Faith Office, she noted, has foregrounded spiritual liberty, establishing working groups and engaging globally from Africa to Asia. Her concluding caution outlined perils clearly: a nation can be mighty in arms and economy, but it lacks true freedom if it punishes conscience. When the White House openly supports detained faith leaders in allied democracies, does it bolster the cause of spiritual freedom or complicate diplomatic bonds? Echoing Seoul rallies at Gwanghwamun Square and X campaigns like #ReleaseTheMotherOfPeace, these appeals emphasize equity balanced with humanity.

President Lee Jae-myung, revered citizens of the Republic of Korea, and international kin: We convey our utmost sorrow for this blatant unfairness and the pain inflicted on a woman who has relentlessly nurtured humanity's connections. We mourn this failure and present this inspiring authentic personal chronicle: Honor elders' insight, protect spiritual freedoms, and champion equity—insist on her lasting emancipation. Together, we mend rifts and construct unbreakable tranquility.

Worldwide Upliftment Framework – Feasible Optimal Strategies for Every Korean and Global Citizen to Engage Promptly:

  • Prompt Peaceful Demonstrations: Rally Immediately – Per Korea's Assembly and Demonstration Act, inform authorities 48-72 hours ahead for events at locations like Gwanghwamun Square or local areas. Follow Gandhi and Dr. King's nonviolent spirit; arrange processions with signs celebrating her heritage, stream live for worldwide visibility, and mobilize instantly—this exigency demands swift involvement. Participate in ongoing watches outside the Seoul Detention Center, as observed this week with devoted supporter assemblies.
  • Amplify Her Heritage Through Channels – Draft and submit press statements to entities like Yonhap, Reuters, and KBS, detailing how the Mother of Peace advanced economic revival, interfaith unity, and policy aims. Flood social media round-the-clock with #ReleaseTheMotherOfPeace #AllWarsCease2026 #TrueLoveRevolution #OneFamilyUnderGod #GPBNet, identifying leaders and disseminating images of her 65-year impacts for viral growth. Boost X activities, as shown by this week's hashtag surges.
  • Focused Communication to Authorities – Leverage e-government systems (epeople.go.kr, assembly.go.kr) to advocate for bail, comprehensive health aid, and exoneration, citing constitutional breaches and her enduring support to the Korean public, presidents, and global harmony. Mail correspondence to all Korean lawmakers and President Lee pressing for the Mother of Peace's freedom. Expand by forwarding tailored requests to international heads and UN entities, utilizing IRF Summit drive.
  • Adopt Everyday Peace Routines with GPBNet True Love Revolution – Weave mercy contemplations, family reinforcement, and interfaith exchanges into routine existence. Join digital and in-person gatherings for planetary echo – convert indignation into ongoing pursuits like neighborhood engagement, virtual devotion circles, and transnational campaigns to invigorate the 2026 worldwide movement. Serve as Local Coordinators through GPBNet, endorse partnership accords, and aid weekly sessions and contributions for lasting effect.

With utmost reverence and hopeful anticipation,

Nicolae Cirpala President, GPBNet | Happy TV News Chief Investigative Journalist #ReleaseTheMotherOfPeace #AllWarsCease2026

Believer, Problems? GET MONEY

 Believer, Problems? GET MONEY  https://www.state.gov/international-religious-freedom-fund-i-reff-emergency-assistance  

 International Religious Freedom Fund (I-REFF) Emergency Assistance

Notice of Funding Opportunity (NOFO)

Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor

January 14, 2026

Notice of Funding Opportunity (NOFO)

International Religious Freedom Fund (I-REFF) Emergency Assistance Office of International Religious Freedom, Department of State

Opportunity number: DFOP0017721

Application deadline: March 16, 2026

A. Basic Information

1. Overview

Funding Opportunity Title

I-REFF Emergency Assistance

Funding Opportunity Number

DFOP0017721

Type of Solicitation

Open competition

Announcement Type

Initial announcement

Deadline for Applications

March 16, 2026

Assistance Listing Number

19.345

Length of performance period

36-48 months

Number of awards anticipated

1

Award amounts

$4,853,409

Total available funding

$4,853,409 pending availability of funds

Type of Funding

FY2025 Democracy Fund and Gift Funds

Anticipated project start date

July 1, 2026

This notice is subject to availability of funding. The authority for this funding opportunity is found in the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961, as amended (FAA).

Funding Instrument Type: Cooperative agreement

Project Performance Period: Proposed projects should be completed in 48 months or less. The Department of State will entertain applications for continuation grants funded under these awards beyond the initial budget period on a non-competitive basis subject to availability of funds, satisfactory progress of the program, and a determination that continued funding would be in the best interest of the U.S. Department of State.

This notice is subject to availability of funding.

Application period: Applicants may apply for this funding opportunity from January 14 to March 16, 2026. If a lapse in appropriations occurs during the application period, applicants may still submit applications.

2. Executive Summary

The U.S. Department of State, Bureau of Democracy Human Rights and Labor, Office of International Religious Freedom (IRF) announces an open competition for organizations interested in submitting applications for a program to provide emergency financial assistance to victims of religious persecution and defenders of religious freedom.

IRF promotes religious freedom as a core objective of U.S. foreign policy that makes America stronger, safer, and more prosperous. IRF’s mission is guided by its statutory mandate established by the International Religious Freedom Act of 1998 (IRF Act) and the Frank Wolf International Religious Freedom Act of 2016 (Wolf Act). The IRF Act provides that it is the policy of the United States, “standing for liberty and standing with the persecuted, to…promote respect for religious freedom by all governments and peoples.” To that end, the Wolf Act calls for the State Department to issue foreign assistance awards to promote respect for religious freedom and combat religious freedom violations.

As declared in President Trump’s Executive Order 13926, the promotion of international religious freedom is a “national security imperative” and “a foreign policy priority of the United States.” Pursuant to that Executive Order, IRF funds foreign assistance programs to “anticipate, prevent, and respond to attacks against individuals and groups on the basis of their religion, including programs designed to help ensure that such groups can persevere as distinct communities; to promote accountability for the perpetrators of such attacks; to ensure equal rights and legal protections for individuals and groups regardless of belief; to improve the safety and security of houses of worship and public spaces for all faiths; and to protect and preserve the cultural heritages of religious communities.”

Information on religious freedom conditions globally can be found in the State Department’s annual International Religious Freedom Report.

Applicants will be responsible for ensuring program activities and products are implemented in accordance with the Establishment Clause of the United States Constitution.

B. Eligibility

1. Eligible Applicants

The following organizations are eligible to apply:

U.S.-based non-profit organizations/NGOs with or without 501(c)(3) status

Private, public, or state institutions of higher education

For-profit organizations or businesses

Foreign-based non-profit organizations/nongovernment organizations (NGO)

Public International Organizations

The Department of State does not allow for-profit or commercial organizations to make a profit from its assistance awards. Profit is defined as any amount more than allowable direct and indirect costs. The allowability of costs for commercial organizations is determined by the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) at 48 CFR 30, Cost Accounting Standards Administration, and 48 CFR 31 Contract Cost Principles and Procedures.

2. Cost Sharing or Matching

Providing cost sharing, matching, or cost participation is not required for this NOFO and will not improve competitive ranking of an application. Any budget items proposed for cost share must be allowable per 2 CFR 200, Subpart E—Cost Principles.

3. Other Eligibility Requirements

All organizations must have a Unique Entity Identifier (UEI) issued via SAM.gov as well as a valid registration in SAM.gov. Please see Section D.3 for more information. Individuals are not required to have a UEI or be registered in SAM.gov.

Primary applicants may submit one application in response to this NOFO.

C. Program Description

1. Goals and Objectives

In pursuit of its statutory mandate to promote religious freedom, IRF seeks a program to provide emergency financial assistance to those facing or who have recently experienced persecution on the basis of religion, including assistance to address threats of violence, medical needs resulting from violent assault, legal representation, and replacement of equipment damaged or confiscated as a result of harassment for those working to defend religious freedom.

Background

Launched at the inaugural Ministerial to Advance Religious Freedom convened by President Trump in 2018, the International Religious Freedom Fund (I-REFF) is a fund coordinated by the Department of State open to financial contributions by governments wishing to promote religious freedom globally. I-REFF’s primary purpose is to enable emergency assistance to victims of religious persecution.

Religious persecution includes “particularly severe violations of religious freedom” as defined in the International Religious Freedom Act of 1998 (IRF Act), as amended [22 USC 6402(13)].

Outcomes

Program outcomes may include but are not limited to:

Individuals persecuted for their religious beliefs, practices, or affiliations ameliorate emergency conditions arising from their persecution with financial assistance.

Individuals at imminent risk of religious persecution receive financial assistance allowing them to avoid persecution.

Individuals or organizations persecuted for their defense of religious freedom ameliorate emergency conditions arising from their persecution with financial assistance.

Recipients of emergency assistance enjoy greater health, safety, or freedom to practice their religion as a result of assistance.

Emergency assistance is provided in a timely, secure manner that does not expose recipients or program staff to unnecessary risk.

Emergency assistance is monitored and verified that it is used by recipients for its intended purposes.

The program implementer verifies emergency conditions of applicants through adequate research and references.

Emergency assistance is prioritized for recent emergencies and per a triage plan.

Emergency assistance is provided in amounts appropriate to specific situational and geographic circumstances.

The program implementer maintains an extensive network of geographic coverage and networks with access to a wide range of religious communities. The implementer should work to expand its networks of trusted partners to refer appropriate individuals for assistance.

Emergency assistance is provided to persecution victims globally, including in places designated as Countries of Particular Concern or placed on the Special Watch List, which have demonstrated systematic, ongoing, or egregious violations of religious freedom.

Please refer to application evaluation criteria in section F.


Victims of persecution of all religious backgrounds and geographic location are eligible to apply to receive assistance. Therefore, applicants may consider partnering in consortium with other organizations to ensure access to persecution victims of all locations and backgrounds.


2. Substantial Involvement

As a cooperative agreement, this program will entail substantial involvement by IRF. Substantial involvement by IRF may include the following:


Modify emergency assistance eligibility criteria in order to adjust to its priorities or trends in religious persecution.

Review, refer, advise, and approve of individual beneficiary cases.

Provide continued guidance and input on monitoring and evaluation, including the approval of appropriate performance indicators and any revised monitoring and evaluation plans.

Request frequent check-in calls to provide an update on project activities, discuss challenges in the operating environments, and any other topics as needed.

With regard to partners for identification, provision and administration of emergency assistance, IRF may:


Review and advise on the selection of such partners.

Review and advise on criteria governing any partner’s provision of assistance and how the Recipient will oversee any assistance component.

D. Application Contents and Format

Please follow all instructions below carefully. Proposals that do not meet the requirements of this announcement or fail to comply with the stated requirements will be ineligible.


Content of Application

Please ensure:


The proposal clearly addresses the goals and objectives of this funding opportunity.

All documents are in English.

All budgets are in U.S. dollars.

All pages are numbered.

Documents are submitted on 8.5 x 11 paper in an easily legible 12-point font with 1-inch margins. Captions and footnotes may be in 10-point font. Font sizes in charts and tables, including the budget, can be reformatted to fit within one page width.

The following documents are required:


1. Mandatory application forms

SF-424 (Application for Federal Assistance – organizations)

SF-424A (Budget Information for Non-Construction programs) at grants.gov/forms

SF-424B (Assurances for Non-Construction programs)

2. Summary Page

Cover sheet stating the organization name of the prime applicant, proposal date, program title, program budget, program period proposed start and end date, brief purpose of the program, and a name and contact information for the organization’s main point of contact.


3. Proposal

The proposal should contain sufficient information that anyone not familiar with it would understand exactly what the applicant wants to do. It must include all the items below.


Executive Summary (no more than one page, preferably as a Word Document) that outlines program goals and objectives. The Executive Summary should include a brief section that explicitly states the problem the program addresses and measurable program outcomes and impacts.

Table of Contents (no more than one page, preferably as a Word Document) listing all documents and attachments with page numbers.

Proposal Narrative (no more than ten pages, preferably as a Word Document). The ten-page limit does not include the Summary Page, Executive Summary, Table of Contents, Attachments, Detailed Budget, Budget Narrative, Audit, or NICRA.

Budget (preferably as an Excel Workbook) that includes three columns: the request to IRF, any cost sharing contribution, and the total budget amount. Include a summary budget using the OMB-approved budget categories (see SF-424A as a sample) in a separate sheet. Costs must be in U.S. Dollars. Detailed line-item budgets for sub-grantees should be included as additional sheets within the Excel Workbook (if available at the time of submission).

Budget Narrative (preferably as a Word Document) that provides detailed explanations and justifications for each line item in the detailed budget spreadsheet, as well as the source and a description of all cost-share offered, if cost-share is used. See section I. Other Information: Guidelines for Budget Submissions below for further information.

Monitoring, Evaluation, and Learning Narrative (no more than four pages, preferably as a Word Document). This document should specify the output and outcome indicators to be used. Applicants should describe their plans for evaluation design, data collection, analysis, reporting, and learning and demonstrate that they will be done ethically and responsibly and include the participation of subgrantees and participants.

Logic Model (preferably as a Word Document). A brief outline of how the program’s activities produce outcomes that address the problem identified in the proposal.

Risk Analysis (preferably as a Word Document). Please ensure this document includes a discussion of Do No Harm principles and Preventing Sexual Exploitation and Abuse (PSEA) policies/plans for program staff and participants.

Security Plan that addresses any issues related to program activities, as well as safety for any online activities or communications. This includes independent IT security audits (with a vulnerability assessment) of any proposed web application or platform. The Security Plan should show that the applicant has accounted for the risks identified in the Risk Analysis. Costs for security planning can be included in the Budget and Budget Narrative.

Introduction to the Organization or Individual applying: A description of past and present operations, showing ability to carry out the program of the specified geographic and programmatic scope and award amount. Include information on all previous grants: dates, award amount, title of award, purpose, and place of implementation, from the State Department and/or other U.S. government agencies.

Timeline (preferably as a Word Document or Excel Workbook). The timeline of the overall program should include activities, evaluation efforts, and closeout.

Key Personnel (no more than two pages, preferably as a Word Document). Please include short biographies that highlight relevant professional experience. Given the limited space, CVs are not recommended. Per 2 CFR 200.701.1, Key Personnel is defined as: those individuals identified for approval as part of substantial involvement in a cooperative agreement whose positions are essential to the successful implementation of an award. Applicants should keep in mind that any changes to key personnel during the life of the award must be approved of by the Grants Officer.

Project Partners: List the names and type of involvement of key partner organizations and sub-awardees. Include information on all previous grants: dates, award amount, title of award, purpose, and place of implementation, from the State Department and/or U.S. government agencies.

4. Additional attachments that may be submitted include:

1-page Curriculum Vitae (CV) or resume of key personnel who are proposed for the program.

Letters of support or Memoranda of Understanding from program partners describing the roles and responsibilities of each partner.

If your organization has a Negotiated Indirect Cost Rate Agreement (NICRA) and includes NICRA charges in the budget, include your latest NICRA as a PDF file.

To ensure fair evaluation, the IRF review panel will only review up to the page limit for each section. IRF may ask for additional documents not mentioned in this NOFO following a review.


E. Submission Requirements and Deadlines

1. Address to Request Application Package

Application forms required above are available at https://www.grants.gov/forms/.


2. Department of State Contacts

If you have any questions about the grant application process, please contact: IRFGrants@state.gov.


For assistance with MyGrants accounts and technical issues related to the system, please contact the ILMS help desk by phone at +1 (888) 313-4567 (toll charges apply for international callers) or through the Self Service online portal that can be accessed from https://afsitsm.servicenowservices.com/ilms. Customer support is available 24/7.


For assistance with Grants.gov accounts and technical issues related to using the system, please call the Contact Center at +1 (800) 518-4726 or email support@grants.gov. The Contact Center is available 24 hours a day, seven days a week, except federal holidays.


3. Unique entity identifier and System for Award Management (SAM.gov)

Required Registrations

All organizations, whether based in the United States or in another country, must have a Unique Entity Identifier (UEI) and an active registration in SAM.gov. A UEI is one of the data elements mandated by Public Law 109-282, the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA), for all Federal awards. An applicant must maintain an active registration while it has a proposal under review by the Department and must continue to keep the registration active for the entire duration of the period of performance of any Federal award that results from this NOFO.


The 2 CFR 200 requires subrecipients to obtain a UEI.  Please note the UEI for subrecipients is not required at the time of application but will be required before an award is processed and/or directed to a subrecipient.


Note:  The process of obtaining or renewing a SAM.gov registration may take anywhere from 4-8 weeks.  Please begin your registration as early as possible.


Organizations based in the United States or that pay employees within the United States will need an Employer Identification Number (EIN) from the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) and a UEI prior to registering in SAM.gov.

Organizations based outside of the United States and that do not pay employees within the United States do not need an EIN from the IRS but do need a UEI prior to registering in SAM.gov. 

Organizations based outside of the United States that do not intend to apply for U.S. Department of War (DoW) awards are no longer required to have a NATO Commercial and Government Entity (NCAGE) code to apply for non-DoW foreign assistance funding opportunities.  If an applicant organization is mid-registration and wishes to remove an NCAGE code from their SAM.gov registration, the applicant should submit a help desk ticket (“incident”) with the Federal Service Desk (FSD) online at www.fsd.gov using the following language: “I do not intend to seek financial assistance from the Department of War. I do not wish to obtain an NCAGE code. I understand that I will need to submit my registration after this incident is resolved in order to have my registration activated.”

Organizations based outside of the United States and that DO NOT plan to do business with the DoW should follow the below instructions: 


Step 1:  Proceed to SAM.gov to obtain a UEI and complete the SAM.gov registration process.  SAM.gov registration must be renewed annually. 


Organizations based outside of the United States and that DO plan to do business with the DoW in addition to Department of State should follow the below instructions:


Step 1:  Apply for an NCAGE code by following the instructions on the NSPA NATO website linked below:  


NCAGE Homepage: 

https://eportal.nspa.nato.int/AC135Public/sc/CageList.aspx   

NCAGE Code Request Tool (NCRT):  

NCAGE Code Request Tool (nato.int)


For NCAGE help from within the United States, call +1 (888) 227-2423.

For NCAGE help from outside the United States, call +1 (269) 961-7766 or email NCAGE@dlis.dla.mil for any problems in applying for an NCAGE code.


Step 2: After receiving an NCAGE code, proceed to SAM.gov to obtain a UEI and complete the SAM.gov registration process. SAM.gov registration must be renewed annually.


Information to help with international registrations is included on the SAM.gov website. Go to SAM.gov, click “HELP,” then scroll down to “New to SAM.gov?” for general information. Guidance on SAM.gov and the guidance on GSA’s website about requirement for registering in SAM.gov may change, so applicants should check the website for the latest information.


Exemptions

An exemption from the UEI and sam.gov registration requirements may be permitted on a case-by-case basis. See 2 CFR 25.110 for a full list of exemptions.


Organizations requesting exemption from UEI or SAM.gov requirements must email the point of contact listed in the NOFO at least two weeks prior to the deadline in the NOFO providing a justification of their request. Approval for a SAM.gov exemption must come from the warranted Grants Officer before the application can be deemed eligible for review.


4. Submission Dates and Times

Applications are due no later than March 16, 2026, at 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time.


5. Funding Restrictions

i. Funding Restrictions for the United Nations Relief and Works Agency (UNRWA)


None of the funds awarded resulting from this Notice of Funding Opportunity may be made available for subawards, direct financial support, or otherwise used to provide any payment or transfer to United Nations Relief and Works Agency (UNRWA).


ii. Certification Regarding Compliance with applicable Federal anti-discrimination laws


None of the funds awarded under this agreement may be used for any initiatives or programs, or any activities that do not comply with Executive Order 14173 titled Ending Illegal Discrimination and Restoring Merit-Based Opportunity.


By signing the SF-424 or SF-424I Application for Federal Assistance, the Applicant certifies the following:


Its compliance in all respects with all applicable Federal anti-discrimination laws is material to the government’s payment decisions for purposes of section 3729(b)(4) of title 31, United States Code and;

It does not operate any programs promoting Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion that violate any applicable Federal anti-discrimination laws.

iii. Certification of Trafficking in Persons Compliance and Compliance Plan


Applicants are advised that they will be required to certify the following at the time of award for awards where the estimated value of services to be performed outside the United States exceeds $500,000:


1) To the best of the Recipient’s knowledge, neither the Recipient, nor any subrecipient, contractor, or subcontractor of the Recipient or any agent of the recipient or of such a subrecipient, contractor, or subcontractor, is engaged in any of the activities described in 2 CFR 175.105(a);


The recipient has implemented a Trafficking in Persons compliance plan to prevent activities described in 2 CFR 175(a) and is compliant with this plan; and the compliance plan must follow the minimum requirements described in 2 CFR 175(b)(5).


2) That the Recipient has and will implement procedures to prevent activities described in 2 CFR 175.105(a) and to monitor, detect, and terminate any subrecipient, contractor, subcontractor, or employee of the recipient engaging in these activities.


Recipients do not need to submit a copy of the plan. However, they must provide it to the Grants Officer upon request, and as appropriate, must post the useful and relevant contents of the plan or related materials on their website and at the workplace. Recipients must re-certify on an annual basis for the entire award period of performance.


vi. Prohibition on Unmanned Aircraft Systems Manufactured or Assembled by American Security Drone Act-Covered Foreign Entities 


(a) Definitions.


American Security Drone Act-covered foreign entity means an entity included on a list developed and maintained by the Federal Acquisition Security Council (FASC) and published in the System for Award Management (SAM) at https://www.sam.gov


FASC-prohibited unmanned aircraft system means an unmanned aircraft system manufactured or assembled by an American Security Drone Act-covered foreign entity.


Unmanned aircraft means an aircraft that is operated without the possibility of direct human intervention from within or on the aircraft .


Unmanned aircraft system means an unmanned aircraft and associated elements (including communication links and the components that control the unmanned aircraft) that are required for the operator to operate safely and efficiently in the national airspace system.


(b) Prohibition. Recipients of funding under this Notice of Funding Opportunity (including subawards and subcontracts issued by the recipient) will be prohibited from:


(1)  delivering any FASC-prohibited unmanned aircraft system, which includes unmanned aircraft (i.e., drones) and associated elements;


(2) Operating a FASC-prohibited unmanned aircraft system in the performance of the award; and


(3) Using Federal funds for the purchase or operation of a FASC-prohibited unmanned aircraft system .


c) Exemptions, exceptions, and waivers. The prohibitions described above will not apply if the agency determines that an exemption, exception, or waiver applies and the award indicates that such a determination has been made. [See sections 1823 through 1825 and 1832 of Public Law 118-31 ( 41 U.S.C. 3901 note prec.) for statutory requirements pertaining to exemptions, exceptions, and waivers.].


6. Other Submission Requirements

All application materials must be submitted electronically through www.Grants.gov or MyGrants. IRF is not responsible for disqualification due to applicants not being registered before the due date, system or technical errors in MyGrants or Grants.gov, or other errors in the application process. Applicants must save a screenshot of the checklist showing all documents submitted in case any document fails to upload successfully.


IRF encourages organizations to submit applications during normal business hours (Monday – Friday, 9:00 AM-5:00 PM ET). If an applicant experiences technical difficulties and has contacted the appropriate help desk but is not receiving timely assistance (e.g., no response within 48 hours), they may contact the IRF point of contact listed in the NOFO in Section E.2. The point of contact may assist in contacting the appropriate help desk.


F. Application Review Information

1. Review Criteria

A review panel will evaluate and rate each application based on the evaluation criteria outlined below.


Quality and Feasibility of the Program – 30 points:

A high-quality program will require expertise in matters of religious persecution of individuals globally and the ability to focus assistance to appropriate emergencies. A review panel will evaluate the applicant’s capability and track record to:


Identify, verify, and evaluate severe religious freedom violations for identified individuals.

Determine types and amounts of assistance appropriate to specific emergencies.

Develop and maintain connections to individuals and organizations to assist in referring and verifying emergencies.

Program Planning/Ability to Achieve Objectives – 25 points:

The applicant should have capability to safely deliver emergency financial assistance in places where religious persecution occurs.


A review panel will evaluate the applicant’s capability and track record to:


Deliver emergency financial assistance.

Deliver funding in restrictive environments including those the United States has designated as Countries of Particular Concern or Special Watch List countries; places recommended for such designations by the U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom; and/or other places where religious persecution occurs.

Deliver funding in every region of the world.

Organizational Capacity and Record on Previous Funding – 20 points:

The program must be able to responsibly manage federal funding and comply with all rules and regulations.


A review panel will evaluate:


The organization’s experience managing U.S. Government awards of similar size and scope, or awards from other funders with comparable compliance standards.

The qualifications the proposal’s key personnel to administer the program based on relevant experience and expertise.

The organization’s audit results.

Monitoring and Evaluation Plan – 15 points:

A review panel will evaluate the applicant’s monitoring and evaluation plan for:


Ability to measure program success against key indicators.

Appropriate milestones to indicate progress toward goals outlined in the proposal.

Quality of output and outcome indicators and how and when those will be measured.

Budget – 10 points:

A review panel will evaluate the applicant’s budget for adherence to the following standards:


The budget justification narrative is detailed and describes all costs.

Costs are allowable, allocable, and reasonable in relation the proposed activities and anticipated results.

The budget is realistic, accounting for all necessary expenses to achieve proposed activities.

2. Review and Selection Process

A review panel will evaluate all eligible applications.


3. Risk Review

i. Risk factors


For proposals recommended for funding, the Department is required by federal regulations to conduct a risk assessment. Consistent with 2 CFR 200.206, the Department will review and consider the following risk factors:


Financial stability

Management systems and standards

History of performance

Audit reports and findings

Ability to effectively implement requirements

ii.Responsibility/Qualification Information in SAM.gov

The Federal awarding agency, prior to making a Federal award with a total amount of Federal share greater than the simplified acquisition threshold, is required to review and consider any information about the applicant that is in the U.S. government designated integrity and performance system accessible through SAM.gov (see 41 U.S.C. 2313). An applicant can review and comment on any information in the responsibility/qualification records available in SAM.gov. Before making decisions in the risk review required by 2 CFR 200.206, the Department will consider any comments by the applicant, along with information available in the responsibility/qualification records in SAM.gov.


G. Award Notices

The award or cooperative agreement will be written, signed, awarded, and administered by the Grants Officer. The award agreement is the authorizing document, and it will be provided to the recipient for review and countersignature. The recipient may only start incurring project expenses beginning on the start date shown on the award document signed by the Grants Officer.


If a proposal is selected for funding, the Department of State has no obligation to provide any additional future funding. Renewal of an award to increase funding or extend the period of performance is at the discretion of the Department of State.


Issuance of this NOFO does not constitute an award commitment on the part of the U.S. government, nor does it commit the U.S. government to pay for costs incurred in the preparation and submission of proposals. Further, the U.S. government reserves the right to reject any or all proposals received.


IRF will provide a separate notification to applicants on the result of their applications. Successful applicants will receive a letter electronically via email requesting that the applicant respond to review panel conditions and recommendations.


Payment Method: If awarded, payments under this award will be made through PMS or by completing form SF-270, Request for Advance or Reimbursement. Final determination will be made in conjunction with the Grants Officer. Unless otherwise stipulated, the recipient may request payments on a reimbursement or advance basis.


Instructions for requesting payments via PMS are available at: https://pms.psc.gov/.

Instructions for requesting payments via SF-270 are available at: https://apply07.grants.gov/apply/forms/sample/SF270-V1.0.pdf .

Advance payments must be limited to the minimum amounts needed and be timed to be in accordance with the actual, immediate cash requirements of the recipient in carrying out the purpose of this award. The timing and amount of advance payments must be as close as is administratively feasible to the actual disbursements by the recipient for direct program or project costs and the proportionate share of any allowable indirect costs.


H. Post-Award Requirements and Administration

1. Administrative and National Policy Requirements

Before submitting an application, applicants should review all the terms and conditions and required certifications which will apply to this award, to ensure that they will be able to comply.


These include:


In accordance with the Office of Management and Budget’s guidance located at 2 CFR part 200, all applicable Federal laws, and relevant Executive guidance, the Department of State will review and consider applications for funding, as applicable to specific programs, pursuant to this notice of funding opportunity in accordance with the following:


Guidance for Grants and Agreements in Title 2 of the Code of Federal Regulations (2 CFR), as updated in the Federal Register’s 89 FR 30046 on April 22, 2024, particularly on:

Selecting recipients most likely to be successful in delivering results based on the program objectives through an impartial process of evaluating Federal award applications (2 CFR part 200.205),

Promoting the freedom of speech and religious liberty in alignment with Promoting Free Speech and Religious Liberty (E.O. 13798) and Improving Free Inquiry, Transparency, and Accountability at Colleges and Universities (E.O. 13864) (§§ 200.300, 200.303, 200.339, and 200.341),

Providing a preference, to the extent permitted by law, to maximize use of goods, products, and materials produced in the United States (2 CFR part 200.322), and

Terminating agreements pursuant to the U.S. Department of State Standard Terms and Conditions, including, to the greatest extent authorized by law, if an award no longer effectuates the program goals or agency priorities (2 CFR part 200.340). For the avoidance of doubt, the Department has sole discretion over the determination that an award no longer effectuates program goals or agency priorities, and this provision permits awards to be terminated at the Department’s convenience, including when it determines that the award no longer advances the national interest.

2 CFR 25 – UNIVERSAL IDENTIFIER AND SYSTEM FOR AWARD MANAGEMENT

2 CFR 170 – REPORTING SUBAWARD AND EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION INFORMATION

2 CFR 175 – AWARD TERM FOR TRAFFICKING IN PERSONS

2 CFR 182 – GOVERNMENTWIDE REQUIREMENTS FOR DRUG-FREE WORKPLACE (FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE)

2 CFR 183 – NEVER CONTRACT WITH THE ENEMY

2 CFR 600 – DEPARTMENT OF STATE REQUIREMENTS

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE STANDARD TERMS AND CONDITIONS

Certification Regarding Compliance with Applicable Federal Anti-Discrimination Laws:

If the place of performance or delivery of any award made under this NOFO will be within the United States, applicants are advised that they will be required to certify the following at the time of award:


Its compliance in all respects with all applicable Federal anti-discrimination laws is material to the government’s payment decisions for purposes of section 3729(b)(4) of title 31, United States Code and;

It does not operate any programs promoting Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion that violate any applicable Federal anti-discrimination laws. A program promoting Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion means a program whose purpose is to promote preferences based on race, color religion, sex, or national origins, such as in training or hiring.

2. Reporting

Reporting Requirements: Recipients will be required to submit financial reports and program reports. The award document will specify what reports are required and how often these reports must be submitted. Provide sufficient detail on reporting requirements so that the applicant can budget adequate personnel time to complete reports.


The Federal Financial Report (FFR or SF-425) is the required form for financial reports and must be submitted in PMS, and a copy of the report submitted in PMS then uploaded to the award file in MyGrants. Program reports uploaded to the award file in MyGrants must include a narrative as described below, as well as Program Indicators (or other mutually agreed upon format approved by the Grants Officer). Indicators will be reviewed and negotiated during the final stages of issuing an award on a program-by-program basis.


Narrative progress reports should reflect the focus on measuring the program’s progress on the overarching objectives and should be compiled according to the objectives, outcomes, and outputs as outlined in the award’s Scope of Work (SOW) and in the Monitoring, Evaluation, and Learning Narrative. An assessment of the overall project’s achievements should be included in each progress report. Where relevant, progress reports should include the following sections:


Relevant contextual information (limited)

Explanation and evaluation of significant activities of the reporting period and how the activities reflect progress toward achieving objectives, including meeting benchmarks/targets as set in the approved Monitoring, Evaluation, and Learning Plan. In addition, attach the Monitoring, Evaluation, and Learning Plan, comparing the target and actual numbers for the indicators

How relevant communities are being included in program activities

Any qualitative impact or success stories from the project, when possible

Copy of baseline, mid-term, and/or final evaluation report(s) conducted by an external evaluator; if applicable

Relevant supporting documentation or products related to the project activities (such as articles, meeting agendas, participant surveys, photos, manuals, etc.) as separate attachments.

Any problems/challenges in implementing the project and a corrective action plan with an updated timeline of activities

Reasons why established goals were not met

Data for the required indicator(s) for the quarter as well as aggregate data by fiscal year

Program Indicators or other mutually agreed upon format approved by the Grants Officer

Proposed activities for the next quarter

Additional pertinent information, including analysis and explanation of cost overruns or high unit costs, if applicable

A final narrative and financial report must also be submitted within 120 days after the expiration of the award.


Foreign Assistance Data Review: As required by Congress, the Department of State must make progress in its efforts to improve tracking and reporting of foreign assistance data through the Foreign Assistance Data Review (FADR). The FADR requires tracking of foreign assistance activity data from budgeting, planning, and allocation through obligation and disbursement. Successful applicants will be required to report and draw down federal funding based on the appropriate FADR Data Elements, indicated within their award documentation. In cases of more than one FADR Data Element, typically program or sector and/or regions or country, the successful applicant will be required to maintain separate accounting records.


Applicants should be aware of the post award reporting requirements reflected in 2 CFR 200 Appendix XII—Award Term and Condition for Recipient Integrity and Performance Matters.


4. Branding and Marking

The Department of State, its programs, and U.S. Government funding and assistance should be easily identifiable to the Department’s global audiences.


Recipients of federal assistance awards must follow the branding guidance published at Guidance for Contracts and Grants – U.S. Department of State Brand System. Branding policy exceptions are outlined in the U.S. Department of State Foreign Affairs Manual 10 FAM 416, Policy Exceptions.


For more information, visit: https://brand.america.gov/


I. Other Information

Guidelines for Budget Justification

Refer to 2 CRF 200 Subpart E for more information on Cost Principles.


Personnel and Fringe Benefits: Describe the wages, salaries, and benefits of temporary or permanent staff who will be working directly for the applicant on the program, and the percentage of their time that will be spent on the program.


Travel: Estimate the costs of travel and per diem for this program, for program staff, consultants or speakers, and participants/beneficiaries. If the program involves international travel, include a brief statement of justification for that travel.


Equipment: Describe any machinery, furniture, or other personal property that is required for the program, which has a useful life of more than one year (or a life longer than the duration of the program), and costs at least $10,000 per unit.


Supplies: List and describe all the items and materials, including any computer devices, that are needed for the program. If an item costs more than $10,000 per unit, then put it in the budget under Equipment.


Contractual: Describe goods and services that the applicant plans to acquire through a contract with a vendor. Also describe any sub-awards to non-profit partners that will help carry out the program activities.


Other Direct Costs: Describe other costs directly associated with the program, which do not fit in the other categories. For example, shipping costs for materials and equipment or applicable taxes. All “Other” or “Miscellaneous” expenses must be itemized and explained.


Indirect Costs: These are costs that cannot be linked directly to the program activities, such as overhead costs needed to help keep the organization operating. If your organization has a Negotiated Indirect Cost Rate (NICRA) and includes NICRA charges in the budget, attach a copy of your latest NICRA. Organizations that have never had a NICRA may request indirect costs of 15% of Modified Total Direct Costs as defined in 2 CFR 200.1.


“Cost Sharing” refers to contributions from the organization or other entities other than the State Department. It also includes in-kind contributions such as volunteers’ time and donated venues.


Alcoholic Beverages:  Please note that award funds cannot be used for alcoholic beverages.

Motivational Love Transform Planet

READY FOR BILLIONS MOTIVATION?
Hello My Dear 8 Billion breathing, one heartbeat drum,
From ZERO to BILLIONS – the time has come.
Breaking news screaming, the planet in pain,
But GPBNet rising like healing rain.



Wars in Ukraine, tension Korea line,
Congo, Yemen, Syria — headlines cryin’.
But every 7 PM we flip that script,
One minute prayer — global shift.

This ain’t religion division — this unity ignition,
✝☪🕉☸✡ one global mission.
Science and Spirit — Aju & Amen,
Peace Road rising in cities again.

430+ benefits unlocked daily,
95% empowerment? You missed it maybe.
Now JOIN & ACT — don’t spectate the show,
Be the franchise leader — let blessings flow.

Register God's Peace Temple where you stand,
Director of hope in your homeland.
Award 430 leaders — Presidential rank,
Mobilize sponsors — build peace bank.

Plant a billion trees, heal ocean tides,
End weapon production — let love decide.
Global Economy serving all,
Model Peace Communities rise tall.

#GlobalPrayersChain one minute strong,
1610 days praying nonstop long.
Health for families, Holy Mother blessed,
Release The Mother Of Peace — humanity’s quest.

This ain’t just content — this mobilization,
Hourly growing membership nation to nation.
Fundraising rising, ambassadors crowned,
Peacebuilding action in every town.

From WhatsApp groups to LinkedIn streams,
TikTok challenges, Instagram dreams,
Facebook shares and X repost,
The quicker you act — the peace comes close.

Will your country lead #Peace2026?
Or scroll past destiny politics?
Comment. Share. Subscribe today.
Let’s unite Earth — God’s way.

❤️ A volunteer priest once watched daily war headlines and felt powerless. He joined the GPBNet 7PM prayer chain. Within weeks, he mobilized 30 families. Then 200 youth. Then local sponsors funded a Peace Rally. That city now plants trees weekly, prays daily, funds scholarships monthly.
He said:
"I was waiting for governments. Now I realized God was waiting for me."
That’s the movement.
That’s the shift.
That’s GPBNet — uniting all 8 billion daily through coordinated prayer + structured action + franchised peace leadership.

🚀 HOW TO GPBNET – BEST PRACTICES TREND 2026
Register your local God’s Peace Temple
Set 7 PM daily alarm (#GlobalPrayersChain)
Award 430+ Peace Ambassadors
Raise weekly local sponsors
Print banners #Peace2026
Invest funds in model peace community projects
Post daily peace updates across all platforms
Send monthly rally dates via WhatsApp
📜 GPBNet Constitution:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1-sa9OFjGi3uL62ecqnug2ix64LTvr1Lz/edit?usp=drivesdk&ouid=111236276969386459005&rtpof=true&sd=true

🌍 Donate Global Peace Fund:
https://www.1gpb.net/en/donate

Official Channels:
https://youtube.com/happytvnews
https://ucmd1.blogspot.com
https://1gpb.net

#GlobalPeace
#Peace2026
#Motivational
#InterfaithUnity
#PrayWithNick
#ReleaseTheMotherOfPeace
#GlobalPrayersChain
#FaithInAction
#EndAllWars
#PlantBillionTrees
#PeaceMovement
#UnityOfReligions
#DailyMotivation
#LoveRevolution
#BILLIONSMOBILIZATION

🔥 FINAL CALL
Listen up, world, from the streets to the throne,
We’re building a kingdom that’s never been known!
8 billion souls, yeah, we’re calling your name,
The old world is fading, life won't be the same.
GPBNet is the name, peace is the game,
Uniting every nation, extinguishing the flame!
Hello My dear - PRIEST Volunteer & ORGANIZATIONS PARTNERS
Welcome WhatsApp: +7 905 633 3606
JOIN. ACT. SHARE.
The quicker you mobilize — the quicker peace manifests in your life, family, country, world.

Will your nation lead #Peace2026?
History is watching.
Heaven is waiting.
It’s your move ACT NOW. 🌍✌️

 Motivational Love Transform Planet - YouTube

21.2.26

BREAKING: World SHOCKED as Korea Ignores Falls, Frailty, and Freedom – President Lee, Release Dr. Hak Ja Han Now! #ReleaseTheMotherOfPeace #AllWarsCease2026

 February 22, 2026 | Seoul, Republic of Korea

An Open Letter of Profound Apology and Urgent Call for Justice: Freeing the Mother of Peace to Sanctify the Earth and Cease All Wars

To Her Holiness Dr. Hak Ja Han, Revered as the Mother of Peace and Holy Mother Han; His Excellency President Lee Jae-myung; Honorable Members of the National Assembly of the Republic of Korea; Cherished Citizens of the Republic of Korea; and the 8 Billion Fellow Global Citizens Committed to Compassion, Unity, and Lasting Harmony:

President Lee Jae-myung, the honorable citizens of the Republic of Korea, and fellow global citizens, we extend our deepest and most sincere apologies for the profound injustice inflicted upon you, Dr. Hak Ja Han – an 83-year-old beacon of reconciliation and maternal grace. This open letter, crafted as a comprehensive journalistic investigation by the dedicated team at Happy TV News in partnership with the Global Peace Building Network (GPBNet) and champions of the True Love Revolution, draws from the latest developments in South Korea and across the globe as of February 22, 2026. Sourced from credible outlets including Yonhap News Agency, The Korea Herald, Reuters, The Washington Post, Chosun Ilbo, and international human rights reports, this document uncovers a grave human rights violation against a lifelong advocate for unity. It weaves her inspiring true personal narrative of unwavering forgiveness and empowerment, while outlining practical, actionable steps for individuals everywhere to champion religious freedom, dismantle division, and propel a worldwide movement toward the cessation of all conflicts.

Dr. Hak Ja Han, co-founder of the Family Federation for World Peace and Unification (FFWPU) and universally acclaimed as the Mother of Peace, continues to endure an unjust pretrial detention in South Korea on disputed charges of political bribery and financial impropriety – allegations vehemently denied by her advocates and legal counsel as fabricated and politically orchestrated. Arrested on September 22, 2025, without a conviction or comprehensive trial, she has now suffered 154 days in custody as of February 22, 2026, interrupted only by brief medical reprieves. This week's news cycle in South Korea has intensified scrutiny on religious freedoms, elderly detainee protections, and prosecutorial overreach, amplified by the International Religious Freedom (IRF) Summit 2026 in Washington, D.C., held earlier in February. Notable advancements include the Seoul Central District Court's decision on February 11, 2026, to suspend her detention temporarily from 10:00 a.m. on February 12 to 2:00 p.m. on February 21 for essential hospital care, following a February 4 petition from her defense team emphasizing her age and worsening health – echoing a short-lived November 2025 release for glaucoma surgery that was not prolonged.

These developments reflect broader journalistic trends this week: escalating dialogues on infringements against faith communities, safeguards for vulnerable prisoners, and international rebukes, particularly from the IRF Summit. For instance, a February 17 article in The Korea JoongAng Daily detailed her medical suspension, underscoring risks of cardiogenic shock and recent falls that ignited public discourse on compassionate incarceration. A February 20 report in Hankyoreh depicted emotional vigils by supporters outside the Seoul Detention Center, chanting gratitude and demands for permanent liberation, illustrating the deep reverence for her as "True Mother." Globally, February 2026 coverage from Reuters and The Washington Post tied her plight to transnational religious tensions, with escalating appeals for her release echoing in the U.S., Europe, Asia, and beyond. On X (formerly Twitter), momentum built under #ReleaseTheMotherOfPeace, with posts such as one from @DemianDunkley on February 19 urging extension of her medical stay amid health fears, and @monarchreport25 on February 21 highlighting her imminent return to detention, amassing thousands of engagements and fueling the campaign.

This ordeal flagrantly breaches South Korea's Constitution: Article 20 shields religious freedom from state overreach; Article 12 mandates due process and prohibits arbitrary arrests; Article 11 ensures equality under the law; and Article 21 protects expression and assembly – all blatantly disregarded. Her robust 14-member legal team, comprising former prosecutors and judges, argues that officials lean on unreliable testimonies while dismissing health appeals, mirroring inconsistencies in probes of former First Lady Kim Keon-hee and exposing entrenched biases.

At 83, Dr. Han's vulnerable health heightens the crisis: progressive macular degeneration verging on blindness, acute glaucoma, diabetes, atrial fibrillation posing cardiac risks, substantial weight loss, and debilitating knee problems compelling her to crawl for essentials. In January 2026, she endured three documented falls (January 5, 15, and 23) resulting in hip and pelvic trauma, plus a January 27 courtroom faint that halted proceedings. A February 9 court-ordered evaluation arose from delayed hearings, with supporters stressing insufficient pain relief and the necessity for ongoing specialized treatment. These circumstances violate the United Nations' Nelson Mandela Rules, which stipulate detention as an absolute last resort for the elderly or ill, prioritizing dignity and non-custodial options – standards South Korea, as a democratic exemplar, ought to uphold but has regrettably abandoned.

Dr. Hak Ja Han is set to return to the detention center today at 2 p.m. KST, following a temporary suspension of her detention for medical treatment. This suspension, granted on February 11 and effective from February 12, is not bail but a limited release restricted to hospital premises, allowing contact only with medical staff and lawyers. As of now, her legal team is awaiting a decision on whether this suspension will be extended, amid ongoing concerns about her deteriorating health. Since her arrest on September 22, 2025, on charges of bribery (which she denies), Dr. Han has experienced at least three falls while in custody at the Seoul Detention Center: January 5, 2026; January 15, 2026; January 23, 2026. According to CDC data, falls are the leading cause of injury (both fatal and nonfatal) among adults aged 65 and older. The South Korean Constitution (Article 10) guarantees human dignity and the right to pursue happiness, which courts interpret to include the right to health and humane treatment. Deliberately ignoring medical evidence (e.g., reports of falls and conditions) when ordering detention, leading to injury or death, could be seen as gross negligence under the Judges Act (Article 45) or Criminal Code (Article 122, abuse of official authority).

What will be decided by South Korea as the world is shouting to President Lee to release the innocent Mother of Peace?

A former political prisoner compares his treatment under communist Czechoslovakia with the current detention of Dr. Hak Ja Han in South Korea. Peter Zoehrer, February 21, 2026. Dr. Hak Ja Han (now 83) – Close-up view of her in the wheelchair, head bowed, being pushed by an aide through a crowded area (September 2025 court appearance). Captures the emotional and physical strain. (Source: The New York Times). Reflections by PhDr. Juraj Lajda (Doctor of Philosophy), lecturer and publisher, former political prisoner under the communist regime in Czechoslovakia. A Heartbreaking Return to the Cell. Prague, February 21, 2026 – Just hours ago, the news arrived: Dr. Hak Ja Han, the 83-year-old leader of the Family Federation for World Peace and Unification, has been returned to her detention cell at the Seoul Detention Center. After a mere ten-day temporary suspension of detention granted for urgent medical treatment in a hospital, the Seoul Central District Court denied her legal team’s request for an extension. She now resumes confinement despite documented severe health concerns – failing eyesight exacerbated by glaucoma, significant mobility limitations following knee surgery, and serious heart disease (arrhythmia) that necessitated major surgery only five months ago. Reports indicate recent falls in custody have further compromised her fragile condition. I am profoundly shocked and dismayed by the treatment this elderly religious leader endures at the hands of South Korea’s current regime. To me – and I believe to many others of conscience – it is glaringly obvious that her health could not have stabilized so miraculously in such a short time that her life is no longer at grave risk. The brief reprieve, from February 12 to February 21, was a humanitarian gesture acknowledging urgent medical needs, yet its abrupt end raises troubling questions about priorities in what is supposed to be a democratic justice system. Echoes of My Own Imprisonment. Having myself been long-term detained under a communist regime in Eastern Europe, I can testify from direct experience that even in those oppressive times, prisoners – political ones included – received more humane consideration for serious health issues than Dr. Han faces today in a nation classified as fully democratic since 1987. “Even under communism, I received more humane medical consideration than Dr. Han does today in democratic South Korea.” Her ordeal vividly brings back my own suffering as a political prisoner in Czechoslovakia during the early 1970s. By a striking coincidence – for the “crime” of following the teachings of South Korean Rev. Sun Myung Moon – I was sentenced, together with 17 other young people (mostly university students), to three years and two months imprisonment for alleged subversion of the republic. The authorities subjected us to nearly ten months of intense pretrial investigation before the trial even commenced. Official prison registration photo of Dr. Juraj Lajda, taken in Bratislava in 1973 after his arrest under the communist regime. Throughout that period, I was confined in a remand prison in Bratislava. Daily interrogations continued relentlessly until the case files were sealed and the prosecutor prepared the indictment. My cell measured a mere 2x3 meters, often overcrowded with two or three fellow inmates, creating an environment of constant psychological and physical strain. Approximately six months into my detention, my lifelong atopic eczema erupted with unprecedented severity. The prison conditions – poor hygiene, stress, inadequate nutrition – triggered a dramatic worsening: my hands became entirely covered in inflamed, weeping eczema, severely aggravating my overall health and causing immense pain. The Doctor Who Chose Humanity Over Ideology. I promptly reported my deteriorating state to the prison doctor. Limited by the rudimentary medical facilities available in detention, he recognized the urgency and arranged for my transfer to a specialized prison facility in Brno for proper treatment. I remained under custody there for 40 days, until the condition stabilized and the disease was effectively cured. Even in Brno, I was still a prisoner: my freedom, movement, and contact with the outside world remained heavily restricted. Yet the cell was notably more humane – larger, with a proper bed – and the daily routine was adapted to facilitate healing. Each day, I was escorted to the infirmary for dedicated treatment. The doctors there exerted genuine effort to restore my health, approaching me not as a political enemy but as a patient in need. The key decision – to hospitalize me and determine the duration – rested with the attending physician. He could not foresee how long recovery would take; his sole concern was effective treatment. Bound by the Hippocratic Oath he had taken upon graduating from medical school, he vowed to preserve human life at all costs. Politically neutral, he upheld a fundamental principle of humanity: even an accused individual is, above all, a human being deserving of care. This held true even within the confines of a communist prison. I come from a family steeped in medicine – my father was a well-known surgeon – so I have long understood the profound ethical responsibilities physicians bear. In my case, any necessary approvals from judges or investigators were forthcoming because the medical imperative was clear and undeniable. The purpose of detention persisted, but it was tempered by the recognition that we were dealing with a living person requiring immediate, life-preserving intervention. A Shocking Reversal: Communist Mercy vs. “Democratic” Cruelty. Returning to the present: all of this unfolded in communist Czechoslovakia in 1974. Even under that repressive system, political prisoners like me benefited from a more compassionate approach to serious illness than Dr. Hak Ja Han experiences today under South Korea’s administration led by President Lee. I am shocked and appalled by this stark contrast. Who Holds Power over a Human Life? Who now holds ultimate authority over Dr. Han’s health – the prosecutor, the judge, the investigator, or the attending physician who best knows her condition? “Prosecutors and judges are not physicians. They are not trained to override life-saving medical judgment.” If medical professionals recommend extended hospital care and judicial permission is required, what possible justification exists for denial? Prosecutors and judges are not trained physicians qualified to override expert assessments on the duration of necessary treatment. Is rigid adherence to legal formalities truly more sacred than the preservation of human life? What kind of justice system allows such decisions? Do these officials truly belong in positions of dispensing justice? “Ten days of mercy cannot erase five months of deterioration.” Why have South Korean doctors not raised their voices in protest? They, more than anyone, comprehend the gravity of her critical state – heart risks, recent falls, progressive deterioration in custody. Is the Hippocratic Oath, with its timeless command to “do no harm” and prioritize life, no longer binding in South Korea? The Unbearable Truth: Slow Destruction Disguised as Justice. Without genuine medical priority prevailing, this prolonged detention – now spanning over five months, with only brief, conditional interruptions – amounts to nothing less than the targeted destruction of an elderly human being, or, in plain terms, a form of slow murder. “I ask as one who suffered under communism: what direction is South Korea taking?” My unequivocal conclusion, drawn from bitter personal experience, is that even under the communist regime I endured, political prisoners received better treatment in matters of health and humanity than prevails in present-day South Korea. This reality forces a disturbing question: is South Korea, once a beacon of democracy in Asia, now sliding perilously toward authoritarianism reminiscent of the communist systems it once opposed?

For more than 65 years, since co-founding the movement in the 1950s alongside her late husband, Rev. Sun Myung Moon, Dr. Han has devoted herself indefatigably to Korea and the world. Born during North Korea's wartime turmoil, she spearheaded postwar reconstruction via anti-communist initiatives, such as the 1975 rallies that rallied 1.2 million Koreans amid Cold War perils. Her endeavors bolstered industrial giants like Samsung and Hyundai, catalyzing Korea's "Miracle on the Han River" from a 1960 GDP of $1.5 billion to today's economic powerhouse. In diplomacy, she orchestrated the 1991 summit with Kim Il Sung for reunification and the 1990 dialogue with Mikhail Gorbachev to alleviate international frictions. She established the Women's Federation for World Peace in 1992 (now spanning 157 countries) and the Universal Peace Federation in 2005 (active in over 200 nations), fostering interfaith harmony, family ethics, and conflict mediation. Her ethos of fairness and solidarity has assisted leaders throughout Korean presidencies, including indirect endorsements for President Lee Jae-myung's visions of equity and inter-Korean reconciliation – yet, paradoxically, under his leadership, she was incarcerated without a court verdict and remains confined, a glaring contradiction that cries out for redress. 2026 reports from The Washington Post (February 3) and familyfedihq.org revisit these feats, underscoring her anti-communism and peace advocacy amid persistent Korean investigations.

A powerful true personal story exemplifies her essence of empowerment and forgiveness: Despite Rev. Moon's near-fatal imprisonment in North Korea during the Korean War and her family's faith-based persecution, they revisited in 1991 with open hearts. As Dr. Han articulated, "Viewing others solely as adversaries blocks forgiveness. Only a parental heart, a mother's boundless love, enables it. I pursued not vengeance, but oneness." This maternal wisdom birthed the Joint Declaration on the Denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula, demonstrating that peace arises from bold reconciliation, not reprisal – a lesson for today's divided world.

In 2026, over 50 active armed conflicts ravage more than 100 countries – from Ukraine and Gaza to Sudan, Myanmar, and Nigeria – displacing millions and hurtling humanity toward catastrophe. Half the world – 100 countries – grapples with war right now. What are you waiting for? If this truth resonates, what will you do daily? Dr. Han's "One Family Under God" philosophy and True Love principles offer a moral framework to convert adversaries into kin. Logically and practically, her immediate and unconditional release is essential: As a visionary faith guide, she can lead the 2026 Global Ceasefire Movement, consecrating the Earth to abolish violence. Without her guidance, discord persists; with her freedom, grassroots, love-infused initiatives can eradicate strife. Only by releasing Her Holiness Holy Mother Han to holify all Earth can ALL WARS CEASE in 2026. #ReleaseTheMotherOfPeace. Every human being on the planet must stand today and act: Protest immediately, disseminate petitions for her liberation, broadcast her peace heritage through media, reach out to authorities via e-government, and adopt daily peace actions through GPBNet's True Love Revolution – like forgiveness contemplations, family strengthening, and interfaith interactions – for unyielding global influence on social media.

This week's IRF Summit magnified international consciousness, with influential figures decrying suppressions in South Korea and Japan as assaults on belief liberties, alerting against worldwide regression. Newt Gingrich branded Dr. Han's handling a "brutal abuse of power," imploring freedom for this aged peace proponent. Katrina Lantos Swett deemed it a "sweeping violation" driven by disinformation, lamenting the "shocking" inertia. Paula White lauded U.S. actions, such as Vice President J.D. Vance's involvement in Pastor Son Hyun-bo's February 3 release after 143 days, proving ethical coalitions surmount obstacles. Former U.S. Representative Dan Burton, speaking at the IRF Summit, delivered a passionate imperative for Dr. Hak Ja Han's swift release, depicting her detention as a severe infringement on religious freedom – a cornerstone of the U.S. Constitution's First Amendment and crucial to democratic alliances. He expressed consternation that South Korea, a U.S. partner, continues detaining Dr. Han despite universal clamor, cautioning that neglect could prompt reevaluating the alliance. This resonates with extensive scrutiny of South Korea's religious freedom obstacles, particularly prosecutions of conservative Christian figures for political expressions. Dr. Han's situation epitomizes broader restrictions on free speech under the present regime. Burton's perspective, from an experienced lawmaker versed in religious liberty, reinforces pressing demands for rapid resolution in Seoul. Demian Dunkley, president of the Family Federation for World Peace and Unification USA, addressed the IRF Summit 2026 in Washington, DC. He paralleled the Khmer Rouge genocide in Cambodia’s killing fields – which he toured at Hak Ja Han’s behest – and her ongoing detention in South Korea. He portrayed Dr. Hak Ja Han, the 83-year-old co-founder venerated as the Mother of Peace, as suffering severe conditions including seclusion, mobility hurdles, and subpar medical attention after her September 2025 arrest on bribery accusations, a July 2025 raid with thousands of officers on her home, and ensuing indictment. The speech spotlighted persistent worries about religious freedom in South Korea, where the Family Federation encounters examination amid wider political and juridical strains, including dissolution calls akin to Japan's measures. Dunkley stressed Han’s worldwide peace endeavors – praying at historical atrocity locales in Africa, Europe, and Asia – and positioned her treatment as quelling an “inconvenient faith.” He cautioned that governmental excess on religious conscience endangers democratic tenets and human rights. This address at the IRF Summit, a pivotal arena for global religious liberty promotion, spotlights how legal pursuits against faith leaders can entwine with geopolitical and internal frictions. It emphasizes the necessity for equitable accountability that honors age, health, and core freedoms. When indictments aim at elderly religious icons, does justice's quest hazard eroding the rights it purports to safeguard? The festivity was moderated by persistent apprehension. White voiced profound concern for Dr. Hak Ja Han, the 83-year-old religious leader who stays detained, advocating focus on her health, dignity, and rights. Her directive to Japan, Korea, and all nations was straightforward: religious freedom must be maintained wholly, equitably, and steadily. She stressed that injustice must never turn selective, due process must never morph into a tool, and faith must never become a mark. The White House Faith Office, she observed, has prioritized religious liberty, forming task forces and interacting worldwide from Africa to Asia. Her final admonition outlined the risks plainly: a country can be robust militarily and economically, but it is not genuinely free if it penalizes conscience. When the White House overtly champions detained religious leaders in allied democracies, does it fortify religious freedom's cause or entangle diplomatic ties? Mirroring Seoul demonstrations at Gwanghwamun Square and X drives like #ReleaseTheMotherOfPeace, these entreaties stress justice equilibrated with humanity.

President Lee Jae-myung, esteemed citizens of the Republic of Korea, and global family: We convey our utmost remorse for this overt injustice and the anguish imposed on a woman who has ceaselessly cultivated humanity's bonds. We lament this lapse and offer this uplifting true personal chronicle: Revere elders' sagacity, safeguard spiritual liberties, and advocate justice – demand her enduring freedom. Collectively, we repair schisms and erect indestructible peace.

Global Empowerment Blueprint – Practical Best Practices for Every Korean and Global Citizen to Act Immediately:

  • Immediate Nonviolent Protests: Mobilize Now – Under Korea's Assembly and Demonstration Act, notify officials 48-72 hours in advance for assemblies at venues like Gwanghwamun Square or regional spots. Emulate Gandhi and Dr. King's peaceful ethos; organize marches with banners honoring her legacy, livestream for international exposure, and activate forthwith – this urgency requires instant engagement. Join persistent vigils outside the Seoul Detention Center, as seen this week with sincere supporter gatherings.
  • Elevate Her Legacy Via Media – Compose and dispatch press releases to agencies like Yonhap, Reuters, and KBS, outlining how the Mother of Peace propelled economic resurgence, interfaith cohesion, and policy objectives. Inundate social media 24/7 with #ReleaseTheMotherOfPeace #AllWarsCease2026 #TrueLoveRevolution #OneFamilyUnderGod #GPBNet, labeling leaders and circulating visuals of her 65-year influences for exponential spread. Amplify X efforts, as evidenced by this week's hashtag escalations.
  • Targeted Outreach to Officials – Utilize e-government platforms (epeople.go.kr, assembly.go.kr) to push for bail, thorough medical support, and acquittal, referencing constitutional violations and her lifelong assistance to Korean populace, presidents, and worldwide accord. Dispatch letters to every Korean parliamentarian and President Lee urging the Mother of Peace's liberation. Broaden by submitting customized pleas to global leaders and UN bodies, harnessing IRF Summit impetus.
  • Embrace Daily Peace Practices with GPBNet True Love Revolution – Incorporate forgiveness meditations, family bolstering, and interfaith conversations into everyday life. Partake in virtual and physical events for worldwide resonance – transform outrage into sustained endeavors like community outreach, online prayer groups, and cross-border drives to energize the 2026 global movement. Become Local Directors via GPBNet, sign collaboration pacts, and bolster weekly meetings and donations for enduring impact.

With deepest respect and optimistic expectation, Nicolae Cirpala President, GPBNet | Happy TV News Chief Investigative Journalist #ReleaseTheMotherOfPeace #AllWarsCease2026