17.10.12

Korea’s Unification Will Bring World Unification


As I was coming out of the Kremlin Palace after meeting Mr.
Gorbachev, I turned to Bo Hi Pak, who had accompanied me,
and gave him a special instruction.
“I need to meet President Kim Il Sung before the end of 1991,” I told
him. “There’s no time. The Soviet Union is going to end in the next year
or two. Our country is the problem. Somehow, I need to meet President
Kim and prevent war from occurring on the Korean peninsula.”
I knew that when the Soviet Union collapsed, most other communist
regimes in the world would also fall. North Korea would find itself
forced into a corner, and there was no telling what provocation it might
commit. North Korea’s obsession with nuclear weapons made the situation
even more worrisome. To prevent a war with North Korea, we
needed a channel to talk to its leadership, but we had no such channel
at that point. Somehow, I needed to meet President Kim and receive his
commitment not to strike first against South Korea.
The Korean peninsula is a scaled-down version of the world. If blood
were shed on the Korean peninsula, it would be shed in the world. If
reconciliation occurred on the peninsula, there would be reconciliation
in the world. If the peninsula were unified, this would bring about
unification in the world. Beginning in the late 1980s, however, North
Korea had been working hard to become a country possessing nuclear
weapons. Western countries were saying that they would stage a first
strike against North Korea, if necessary. If the situation continued to
the extreme, there was no telling what desperate move North Korea
might attempt. I knew I somehow needed to open a channel of communication
with North Korea.
It was not an easy task. Bo Hi Pak communicated with North Korean
Vice Premier Kim Dal Hyun, but North Korea’s response was firmly in
the negative.
“The people of North Korea know President Moon only as the ringleader
of the international movement for victory over communism,” the
vice premier said. “Why would we welcome the leader of a conservative,
anti-communist group? A visit to North Korea by President Moon
absolutely cannot be permitted.”
Bo Hi Pak did not give up. “President Nixon of the United States
was a strong anti-communist,” he reminded the North Korean official.
“But he visited China, met Chairman Mao Zedong, and opened
diplomatic relations between the United States and China. It was
China that profited from this. Until then, China had been branded
an aggressor nation, but it is now rising as the central country on
the world stage. For North Korea to have international credibility,
it should establish a friendship with a worldwide anti-communist
such as President Moon.”
Finally, President Kim Il Sung invited my wife and me on November
30, 1991. We were in Hawaii at the time, so we quickly flew to Beijing.
While we were waiting in the VIP lounge of Beijing Capital International
Airport, which the government of China had arranged for us to use, a
representative of the North Korean government came and handed us
the official invitation. The official stamp of the Pyongyang government
was clearly visible on the document.
“The Democratic People’s Republic of Korea extends an invitation to
Mr. Moon Sun Myung of the Unification Church, his wife, and entourage
to enter the Republic. Their safety is guaranteed during the period
of their stay in the North.”
It was signed “Kim Dal Hyun, Vice Premier, Cabinet of the Democratic
People’s Republic of Korea. November 30, 1991.”
Our group boarded a special flight of Air Koryo (aircraft no. JS215)
arranged for us by President Kim. A special flight from President Kim
had never been arranged for any foreign head of state, so this was very
exceptional and special treatment.
The aircraft flew over the Yellow Sea, up to Sin-eui-ju, over my
hometown of Jeong-ju, and on to Pyongyang. The special route had
been charted to let me see my hometown. My heart began to pound
as I looked down at my hometown, dyed red by the light of the setting
sun, and I felt numb deep in my being. I wondered, “Can this
really be my hometown?” I wanted to jump out right away and start
running around the hills and valleys.
At Pyongyang’s Sunan International Airport, family members
whom I had not seen for forty-eight years were there to greet me. My
younger sisters, who used to be as beautiful as flowers, had become
grandmothers entering their senior years. They grasped my hands,
creased their eyebrows, and began to cry wildly. My older sister,
now more than seventy, grabbed me by the shoulder and cried. I,
however, did not cry.
“Please,” I said, “don’t do this. It’s important for me to meet my family,
but I came to do God’s work. Please don’t do this. Get hold of yourselves.”
Inside my heart, I was shedding tears like a waterfall. I was seeing
my sisters for the first time in more than forty years, but I could not
embrace them and cry with them. I maintained control of my heart,
and made my way to our place of lodging.
The next morning, as has been my custom throughout my life, I
awoke early in the morning and began to pray. If there were any surveillance
apparatus in the guesthouse, my tearful prayer for the unification
of the Korean peninsula would have been recorded in its entirety. That
day, we toured the city of Pyongyang. The city was well-fortified with
the red slogans of juche ideology.
On the third day of our visit, we boarded an aircraft to tour Mount
Kumgang. Though it was the winter season, the Kuryong Falls had not
frozen and still spouted a strong flow of water. After touring all the different
areas of Mount Kumgang, we boarded a helicopter on our sixth
day, to be transported to my hometown. In my dreams, I had felt such
a strong yearning for my childhood home that I felt as though I could
run to it in one bound. And now, there it was, appearing before me.
I could hardly believe my eyes. Was this real, or was I dreaming? For
what seemed like the longest time, I could only stand there, like a statue,
in front of my home. After several minutes, I stepped inside. It used to
be in the shape of a square, with the main wing, guest wing, storehouse,
and barn built around a central courtyard. Now, only the main wing
remained. I went into the main room, where I had been born, and sat
on the floor with my legs crossed. Memories of what it had been like in
my childhood came back to me as clearly as if it were only yesterday. I
opened the small door that led from the main room to the kitchen and
looked out at the backyard. The chestnut tree I used to climb had been
cut down and was gone. It seemed as though I could hear my mother
calling to me sweetly. “Is my little tiny-eyes hungry?” The cotton cloth
of her traditional dress passed quickly before my eyes.
I visited my parents’ grave site and offered a bouquet of flowers. The
last time I saw my mother was when she came to visit me in prison
in Heungnam and cried out loud. Her grave was thinly covered by
the snow that had fallen the night before. I brushed it away with the
palm of my hand and gently caressed the grass that had grown over her
grave. The rough touch of the grass reminded me of the roughness of
my mother’s skin on the back of her hand.

16.10.12

“Allow Freedom of Religion in the Soviet Union”


There are a number of materialism-based theories that are
popularly held but not verified. One is Charles Darwin’s theory
of evolution. Another such theory comes from the writings of
Karl Marx. The idea that spirit originates from matter is wrong down
to its root. Human beings are created by God, and all beings are unified
bodies having both material and spiritual aspects. In short, the core
theory and philosophy underlying communism is wrong. While studying
in Japan, I worked together with communists for the independence
of Korea. They were my good friends who were prepared to give their
lives, if necessary, for the liberation of our homeland; but our way of
thinking was fundamentally different. So, once independence was
achieved, we had to go our separate ways.
I am opposed to the historical materialism of communism. I have
carried out a movement for victory over communism throughout the
world. I have advised successive U.S. presidents to protect the free
world, standing up to the communist strategy of turning the world red.
Communist countries that were unhappy with my actions attempted
to remove me through acts of terror, but I do not hate them. Nor do
I consider them my enemy. I oppose the philosophy and ideology of
communism, but I have never hated its people. God wants even communists
to be brought into His oneness.
In that sense, my visit to Moscow in April 1990 for a meeting with
President Mikhail Gorbachev and my visit to Pyongyang the next year
for a meeting with President Kim Il Sung were not simple journeys;
they were taken at the risk of my life. It was my destiny to go on these
journeys to convey Heaven’s will to these men. I said only half-jokingly
at the time that Moscow, pronounced in English, sounds similar to
“must go,” and so I had to go.
I had a long-held conviction regarding communism. I could
foresee that signs pointing to the fall of communism would begin
to appear after about sixty years from the Bolshevik Revolution, and
that the Soviet edifice would fall in 1987, the seventieth anniversary
of the revolution. So I was excited in 1984, when I heard that Dr.
Morton Kaplan, a noted political scientist at the University of Chicago,
was proposing to hold an international conference titled, “The
Fall of the Soviet Empire.” I asked him to pay me a visit in Danbury
prison so that we could discuss the details. The first thing I said to
him when we met was that I wanted him to declare “the end of Soviet
communism” before August 15 of that year.
Dr. Kaplan responded, “Declare the end of Soviet communism? How
can I do such a risky thing?” and indicated he was not inclined to do this.
But, it’s the final flame that burns the brightest. In 1985, the Soviet Union
was increasing its worldwide influence, and there were no outward signs
of its decline. So it was natural that Dr. Kaplan would be reluctant. If he
made a declaration predicting such a specific event and it turned out to
be false, his reputation as a scholar could be destroyed overnight.
“Rev. Moon,” he said, “I believe you when you say that Soviet communism
will fall. But I don’t think it will happen just yet. So instead
of declaring, ‘the end of Soviet communism,’ how about if we say ‘the
decline of Soviet communism? ’” I saw, too, that he was proposing to
soften the title of his program and use something other than “Fall of the
Soviet Empire.”
I burned with anger. These were compromises I could not accept. I
felt strongly that if a person had conviction, he should be brave and put
out all his energy to fight, even if he feels afraid.
“Dr. Kaplan,” I said, “What do you mean? When I ask you to declare
the end of communism, I have a reason. The day you declare the end of
communism, it will take energy away from it and help bring about its
peaceful collapse. Why are you hesitating?”
In the end, Dr. Kaplan declared “the end of Soviet communism” at
a conference of the Professors World Peace Academy (PWPA) held in
Geneva under the title, “The Fall of the Soviet Empire: Prospects for
Transition to a Post-Soviet World.” It was something that no one had
dared consider. Because Switzerland was a neutral country, Geneva was
a major staging area for the Soviet Committee for State Security (KGB),
and many KGB agents worked from there to carry out espionage and
terror activities around the world. The Intercontinental Hotel, where
the PWPA conference was held, faced the Soviet embassy across the
street, so I can well imagine how much fear Dr. Kaplan must have felt.
A few years later, however, he became well-known as the scholar who
first predicted the end of Soviet communism.
In April 1990, I convened the World Media Conference held in Moscow.
Unexpectedly, the Soviet government gave me head-of-state–level
protocol, beginning at the airport. We were transported to the center
of Moscow in a police-escorted motorcade. The car that carried me
traveled on the yellow section of the road, which was used only by the
president and state guests. This happened before the collapse of the Soviet
Union. The Soviet government afforded this exceptional treatment
to me, an anti-communist.
At the conference, I gave an address praising the move toward perestroika.
I said this revolution must be bloodless, and that it must be a
revolution of the mind and spirit. The purpose of my visit was to attend
the World Media Conference, but my mind was focused on meeting
President Gorbachev.
At the time, President Gorbachev was popular within the Soviet
Union, following the successes of his perestroika policies. I could have
met the U.S. president ten times if I’d wanted to, but meeting President
Gorbachev was much more difficult. I was concerned that even one
meeting might be difficult to achieve. I had a message to give him, and
it was important that I do this in person. He was reforming the Soviet
Union, giving rise to the winds of freedom there, but as time passed,
the swords of reform were being increasingly pointed at his back. If the
situation were left unchecked, he was about to fall into great danger.
I explained, “If he does not meet me, he has no way to catch the wave
of heavenly fortune, and if he cannot do that, he will not last long.”
Perhaps President Gorbachev heard this expression of my concern.
The next day, he invited me to the Kremlin Palace. I rode in a limousine
provided by the Soviet government and entered deep into the Kremlin.
On entering the presidential office, my wife and I took our seats, and
Cabinet ministers of the Soviet Union took seats next to us. President
Gorbachev smiled a big smile and gave us an energetic explanation of
the successes of his perestroika policies. Then he showed me into an
anteroom, where we met one on one. I used this opportunity to give
him the following message.
“Mr. President, you have already achieved much success through
perestroika, but that alone will not be sufficient for reform. You need
to immediately allow freedom of religion in the Soviet Union. If you
try to reform only the material world, without the involvement of God,
perestroika will be doomed to fail. Communism is about to end. The
only way to save this nation is to allow the freedom of religion. The time
is now for you to act with the courage that you have shown in reforming
the Soviet Union and become a president of the world who works to
bring about world peace.”
President Gorbachev’s face hardened at the mention of religious
freedom, as though he had not been expecting this. As one would
expect from the man who had allowed the reunification of Germany,
however, he quickly relaxed his expression and soberly accepted my
words to him. I continued, saying, “South Korea and the Soviet Union
should now open diplomatic relations. In that context, please invite
South Korean President Roh Tae Woo to visit.” I also explained a list of
reasons why it would be good for the two countries to have diplomatic
relations. After I had finished all I wanted to say, President Gorbachev
made a promise to me with a tone of certitude that I had not heard him
express prior to that point.
“I am confident,” he said, “that relations between South Korea and
the Soviet Union will develop smoothly. I, too, believe that political
stability and the relaxation of tensions on the Korean peninsula is necessary.
Opening diplomatic relations with South Korea is only a matter
of time; there are no obstacles. As you suggested, I will meet President
Roh Tae Woo.”
As I was about to leave President Gorbachev that day, I took off my
watch and put it on his wrist. He seemed a little bewildered that I would
treat him as I might an old friend. So I told him firmly, “Each time your
reforms face difficulty, please look at this watch and remember your
promise to me. If you do that, Heaven will surely open a path for you.”
As he promised me, President Gorbachev met President Roh in
San Francisco in June that year for a bilateral summit. Then, on September
30, 1990, South Korea and the Soviet Union signed a historic
agreement to open diplomatic relations for the first time in eightysix
years. Of course, politics is the job of politicians, and diplomacy
is the job of diplomats. Sometimes, though, when a door has been
closed for a long time, a religious person who has no interests at
stake can be more effective.
Four years later, President and Mrs. Gorbachev visited Seoul, and
my wife and I hosted them at our home in the Hannam Dong neighborhood.
He had already been removed from power by a coup d’état.
Following the coup by anti-reformist forces opposed to perestroika, he
had resigned his position as general secretary of the Soviet Communist
Party and dissolved the party. As a communist, he had eliminated the
Communist Party. The former president and first lady used chopsticks
to eat the bulgogi and jabchae we had carefully prepared. When he was
served su-jeong-gwa as dessert, Mr. Gorbachev repeated several times,
“Korea has excellent traditional foods.” He and the first lady appeared
quite different from the days when he was in office. Mrs. Gorbachev,
who had previously been a thoroughgoing Marxist-Leninist lecturing
at Moscow State University, wore a necklace with a crucifix.
“Mr. President, you did a great thing,” I told him. “You gave up your
post as general secretary of the Soviet Union, but now you have become
the president of peace. Because of your wisdom and courage, we now
have the possibility to bring world peace. You did the most important,
eternal, and beautiful thing for the world. You are a hero of peace who
did God’s work. The name that will be remembered forever in the
history of Russia will not be ‘Marx,’ ‘Lenin,’ or ‘Stalin.’ It will only be
‘Mikhail Gorbachev.’”
I gave high praise to the decision by Mr. Gorbachev to bring about
the breakup of the Soviet Union, the mother country of communism,
without shedding blood.
In response, Mr. Gorbachev said, “Rev. Moon, I have been greatly
comforted by your words. Hearing your words gives me energy. I will
devote the remainder of my life to projects that are for the sake of world
peace.” And he firmly took my hand in his.

15.10.12

The River Does Not Reject the Waters That Flow into It


Selfishness is rampant in the world. Ironically, however, the individual
is destroyed by this, and not just the individual, but those
around him and the nation as a whole. The greatest obstacle to
the world of peace is avarice in peoples’ hearts. It starts in individuals,
expands to the nation, and hearts stained with avarice cause division
and conflict at every level. Countless people throughout history have
shed blood and died in conflicts caused by avarice.
To eliminate such conflicts, we need a great revolution to change the
erroneous values and thinking that are widespread in the world today.
The complex problems our societies face today can be resolved quickly
if there is a revolution in peoples’ thinking. If each individual and nation
begins to look out for the other first, working together with the
other, the problems of modern society will be resolved.
Throughout my life, I dedicated myself to efforts for peace. Any
time the word “peace” comes up, I become emotional. I choke up, it
becomes difficult for me to swallow my food and tears begin to well up
in my eyes. It moves me deeply just to imagine the day when the world
becomes one and begins to enjoy peace. That is the nature of peace.
It links people who think differently, are of different races, and speak
different languages. Our hearts yearn for this world and harbor a hope
that it will be realized. Peace is concrete action; it is not a vague dream.
Building a movement for peace has not always been easy. There have
been many difficulties, and it has required large sums of money. I have
not done this for my own honor, nor to make money. All I did was invest
my full effort, so that we can have a world where a strong and true peace
takes root. For as long as I have been doing this work, I have never been
lonely. This is because, ultimately, peace is the desire of every person in
the world. It is strange, though. Even though everyone wants peace, it
has still not come.
It is easy to talk about peace. But to bring peace is not easy. This is
because people push aside the most elemental truth needed to bring
about a world of peace. They pretend not to know this truth is there.
Before we talk about peace among individuals or among nations, we
must talk about peace between ourselves and God.
Each religion today thinks of itself as the highest, rejecting and
looking down on other religions. It is not right to build fences against
other religions and denominations.
A religion is like a wide river flowing toward an ideal, peaceful
world. The river flows for long distances before it comes to the
wide expanse of peace. On its way, many streams flow into it. The
streams cease to be streams from the point they meet the river.
From that point, they, too, become part of the river. In this way,
they become one.
The river does not reject any of the streams that flow into it. It
accepts them all. It embraces all the streams and forms a single flow
as it continues toward the ocean. People in the world today do not
understand this simple truth. The streams that seek out the river and
flow into it are the numerous religions and denominations of today.
Each stream traces its origin to a different spring, but they are all going
to the same destination. They are seeking the ideal world overflowing
with peace.
Peace will never come to this earth unless we first tear down the
walls between religions. For thousands of years, religions have grown
in alliance with particular ethnic groups, and so they are surrounded
by high cultural walls. Tearing these down is an extremely difficult task.
For thousands of years, each religion has surrounded itself with such
high walls, insisting that it is the only correct religion. In some cases,
religions have expanded their influence and entered into conflicts and
fights with other religions, using God’s name in places that had nothing
to do with His will.
The will of God lies in peace. A world fragmented by differences in
nationality, race, and religion, where people attack and fight one another
and shed one another’s blood, is not what God wants. When we
shed blood and fight each other in His name, we only cause Him pain.
A world torn to shreds has been created out of the desires of people to
promote their own wealth and glory. It does not represent the will of
God. God clearly told me so. I am only His errand boy, receiving His
words and carrying them out on Earth.
The path to bring about a world of peace, in which religions and
races become united, has been exhausting. Many times, I was rejected
by people, or my own abilities fell short, but I could not put aside this
mission. When members and colleagues who worked with me would
cry out in anguish because of the difficulty of the task, I would even feel
envious of them.
“If you decide this path isn’t for you, you have the option to stop and
turn back,” I told them. “Or if you try and try and still can’t accomplish
it, you have the option to die trying.”
“But you should pity me,” I said. “I am a person with no such options.”
There are some two hundred countries in the world. For all these
countries to enjoy peace, the power of religion is absolutely necessary.
The power of religion is in the love that overflows from it. I am
a religious person whose role is to convey love, so it is natural that I
would work for world peace. There is no difference between Islam and
Christianity in their commitment to bring about a world of peace. In
America, I lead a movement for peace, bringing together twenty thousand
clergy who transcend denomination. Through this movement, we
discuss ways that Christianity, Islam, Judaism, Buddhism, and all faiths
can come together. We devote our full efforts to change the hardened
hearts of people.
My purpose is the same today as it was yesterday. It is to create one
world with God at the center, a world brought together like a single nation
without boundaries. All humanity will be citizens of this world, sharing a
culture of love. In such a world, there will be no possibility for division and
conflict. This will mark the beginning of a truly peaceful world.

Petition to governments of all countries to officially accept Rev. Dr. Sun Myung Moon chosen by God | Petition to governments of all countries to accept Rev. Dr. Sun Myung Moon chosen by God as messiah! | causes.com

7bt Petition to governments of all countries to accept Rev. Dr. Sun Myung Moon chosen by God as messiah!

PETITION: Petition to governments of all countries to officially accept Rev. Dr. Sun Myung Moon chosen by God

To: governments of all countries

Petition to governments of all countries to officially accept Rev. Dr. Sun Myung Moon chosen by God and called by Jesus Christ to fulfill the mission of the Messiah, Savior and Lord of the Second Advent with the responsibility to establish the Kingdom of Heaven on Earth by 2013, January 13 Heavenly...SEE MORE
Petition-x 
 
Rev. Dr. Sun Myung Moon chosen by God and called by Jesus Christ to fulfill the mission of the Messiah, Savior and Lord of the Second Advent with the responsibility to establish the Kingdom of Heaven on Earth
    Comments